Spam filtering is clearly not the accusation that was laid out. On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 11:48 AM Hunter Fuller <hf0002+na...@uah.edu> wrote:
> I wouldn't call it a serious claim. By their own admission T-Mobile > filters messages based on content. > > > https://community.t-mobile.com/accounts-services-4/can-t-send-receive-texts-that-contain-goo-gl-7776 > > Now, there is no indication I'm aware of, that it is political in > nature. But they do, factually, throw away messages based on their > content. > > -- > Hunter Fuller (they) > Router Jockey > VBH M-1C > +1 256 824 5331 > > Office of Information Technology > The University of Alabama in Huntsville > Network Engineering > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:46 AM Tom Beecher <beec...@beecher.cc> wrote: > > > > It's a pretty serious claim to say that cell providers were selectively > not delivering messages based on content. > > > > Unless you have some more concrete evidence beyond "I sent a few texts" > , this list is no place for such things, nor the insinuation of political > agendas. > > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:54 AM Ethan O'Toole <telmn...@757.org> wrote: > >> > >> > They may tell you they are not but there is no doubt in my mind they > are and > >> > if they got caught their response would be “Oopsie, my bad”. > >> > -richey > >> > >> During Covid hysteria cellular carriers were definitly scrubbing text > >> messages that contained things against whatever the agenda was. > >> > >> There was no errors from the cellular carriers that the message didn't > go > >> through, it just never arrived to the destination. Tested it first hand, > >> T-Mobile to Verizon, T-Mobile to AT&T and vice versa. Payload was links > to > >> a few websites that weren't popular with the left, like that Doctor > Robert > >> Malone guy. These were not using URL shorteners that are sometimes > >> considered spam. > >> > >> > >> - Ethan >