> > I would like to make an effort to debogon 240/4 at least, or have an > authorized experiment to at least determine how fully bogon'd it is. >
It would not be appropriate to 'debogon' 240/4 based on the currently accepted definition, because it is space not allocated to an RIR. I know that you are part of the groups who wish to have the status of 240/4 changed, but until that happens, the reference to it in bogon tools should not change. On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 10:57 PM Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 10:17 AM James Shank <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Dear NANOG! > > > > As many of you know, Team Cymru runs a free service delivering updated > > BOGONS to networks around the world. We've been doing this for decades > > at this point. For more information about this service, please see > > https://www.team-cymru.com/bogon. > > > > Recently, we've discussed internally a discrepancy between our BGP based > > feed and the other formats we deliver for our Traditional BOGONS feed. > > For historic reasons, we previously omitted delivery of some ranges that > > are BOGONS from our BGP advertisements. We are considering adding the > > below ranges back in, but want to hear feedback from the community on > > these ranges prior to advertising them, out of an abundance of caution. > > > > The below ranges are what we are currently considering advertising: > > 0/8 (this one we already have concluded is safe as it is already > > advertised in our "FULL BOGONS" set.) > > 127/8 > > 224/4 > > 240/4 > > > > Note that 224/4 and 240/4 may be aggregated differently in our > > advertisement, but are broken out here to facilitate discussion. > > I would like to make an effort to debogon 240/4 at least, or have an > authorized experiment to at least determine how fully bogon'd it is. > > Some recent data about amazon and verizon: > > https://labs.ripe.net/author/qasim-lone/2404-as-seen-by-ripe-atlas/ > > One question for me is how many folks rely on regular bogon updates > such as yours. There are others. > > > So, fellow NANOGers, what say ye? I would love to hear your feedback, > > pro or con, well-reasoned with data points or general "argh! there be > > dragons!" sentiments. > > > > Looking forward to seeing folks in Hollywood for N86! > > > > Cheers! > > > > James > > > > -- > > *James Shank* > > Chief Architect of Community Services and Sr. Security Evangelist > > e: [email protected] > > o: +1 847 378-3365 > > > > > -- > FQ World Domination pending: > https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_codel/ > Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC >
