Saku Ytti <[email protected]> writes: > On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 10:01, Bjørn Mork <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Why would you do it differently than for dual-stack routers, except that >> you skip the step where you configure the ID as a loopback address? > > Because you may not have an option, if you're IPv6 only, vendors (e.g. > junos) may expect you to punch it manually. Of course most of us punch > it manually as loopback0 IPv4 to have more control over outcome. > Question is legitimate and represents change where previously used > mechanisms do not apply, therefore OP is right to ask 'well what > should I do now'.
I'm not used to punching anything, so I probably have too simple a view of the world. But I still don't understand how this changes the ID allocation scheme, which is how I understood the question. I assume the punched value was based on input from somewhere? Bjørn
