On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:51:13AM -0400, Jon Lewis wrote: [snip] > And just for the record, despite having been bitten by it more than > once, I'm very much in the camp of "if you advertise a covering > aggregate, you're offering to get packets there, regardless of whether or > not more specifics exist." You have no business demanding what routes > someone else's network receives/accepts. All you can reasonably control > is what you advertise and what you accept. This. People will come up with all sorts of creative topologies, and as long as they are *internal* that's A-OK. The distance outside of one's AS one can expect "interesting" TE to travel is equivalent to the reach of your $s and/or contracts.
Cheers, Joe -- Posted from my personal account - see X-Disclaimer header. Joe Provo / Gweep / Earthling
