Tangentially related to xR1, have any of you started deploying SN connectors on your 400G head-ends? It looks like a pretty clever technology, adding discrete connectors per lane, but curious what the adoption has been thus far.
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 8:55 AM Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> wrote: > On Tue, 4 Apr 2023, Jared Mauch wrote: > > > We are willing to do 100G-LR1 if someone asks these days. It lets us be > > able to roll it up into 400G optics on our side as appropriate. > > I hope the industry moves to 100G-LR1, as doing 2x100GBASE-LR4 in a 400G > port is quite meh when it comes to faceplate capacity. > > Unfortunately 100GBASE-LR4 will be with us for a long long time. > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm...@swm.pp.se >
