On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Roland Dobbins wrote:
    > With all due respect, both of these posited choices are quite ugly and
    > tend to lead to huge operational difficulties, susceptibility to DDoS,
    > etc.  Definitely not recommended except as a last resort in a difficult
    > situation, IMHO.

I wouldn't go quite so far as to say that they have security implications, 
but I definitely agree that these are solutions of last resort, and that 
any live load-balanced solution is infinitely preferable to a stand-by 
solution.  Which, IMHO, is unlikely to ever work as hoped for.  I was just 
answering the question at hand, rather than the meta-question of whether 
the question being asked was the right question.  :-)

                                -Bill


Reply via email to