RE: MX204 tunnel services BW

[Jeff Behrns via NANOG]

-----Original Message-----
From: Delong.com <o...@delong.com> 
Sent: Monday, October 2, 2023 5:47 PM
To: behrnsj...@yahoo.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: MX204 tunnel services BW

> “Tunnel gets whatever bandwidth is left after physical port packets are 
> processed” and likely some additional overhead for managing the sharing.

>Could that be what’s happening to you?

Aggregate throughput for the box was less than 100Gbps while the tunnel was 
being starved.