About as ugly as a graph as ive seen! Reverse path for this site is cogent, mtr and forward ISP failing me a bit not returning the transition hop IP I need to verify, but im assuming its Arelion. This site is in the southeast also.
[cid:[email protected]] From: NANOG <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Steve Feldman Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 10:37 AM To: Elmar K. Bins <[email protected]> Cc: NANOG <[email protected]> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Arelion/Telia AS1299 issues? $dayjob has transit from 1299 in Miami. We’ve been seeing packet loss nearby in their network since around 06: 00 UTC, still ongoing. Steve > On Oct 24, 2023, at 8: 20 AM, Elmar K. Bins <elmi@ 4ever. de> wrote: > > We also observed ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Report Suspicious <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/MQS9YPUatEJj!i4ZDkHftmwe3H0JvedmHHhW_2t4DY3hWkyfYuBLeQ3bHEB3ja6kIgXJzwWCVRZuBlVEkFmZSEzdnPRSuKhsqw8XY6Ke8Hg551lyf7iTALgB-nw$> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd $dayjob has transit from 1299 in Miami. We’ve been seeing packet loss nearby in their network since around 06:00 UTC, still ongoing. Steve > On Oct 24, 2023, at 8:20 AM, Elmar K. Bins > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > We also observed this today, UTC morning, esp. across the pond, and our > alternative paths from Europe to the US were suffering from the still unfixed > fibre cut, so I was a bit unhappy with 200 extra ms, and 60% loss. > > 1299 seems to've found an alternative path in the meantime, looks good to us. > > Elmar. > > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> (Andrian Visnevschi via NANOG) wrote: > >> We had the same issue with Arelion this morning, a huge increase in the >> latency and jitter was happening across the US and of course for any >> traffic sourced from the EU flowing to the US. >> Within the US we noticed a latency spike from 20-50ms to ~200ms. From the >> EU to our US facilities, we noticed a spike from ~130ms to ~400ms. >> >> >> We ended up shifting traffic from Arelion to a different carrier, and will >> stay there until we are confident that they fixed any issue that they had >> in their network. To be honest, we've been experiencing quite similar >> issues with unstable latency on Arelion over the past couple of months, and >> it's becoming quite frustrating >> >> >> >> >> *Andrian Visnevschi* >> >> VP of Network & Security >> >> +373 68374133 >> >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> | >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://acreto.io__;!!MQS9YPUatEJj!iZ7j3VWHoxkh3S3Y9nSVzutat2MUlem16ycD6ZkjZEKDIfzdtZuY1hZ8YlspD9zJ_9Go4lCTes737Rtqe1SEPX-_sA$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/acreto.io__;!!MQS9YPUatEJj!iZ7j3VWHoxkh3S3Y9nSVzutat2MUlem16ycD6ZkjZEKDIfzdtZuY1hZ8YlspD9zJ_9Go4lCTes737Rtqe1SEPX-_sA$> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 6:03 PM David Hubbard >> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >> wrote: >> >>> Hey all, anyone aware of issues with Arelion this morning? We have a >>> bunch of end users on at least Cox and Cogeco who are having serious issues >>> with service access, and the problem appears to be on the return path where >>> it traverses Arelion. Source net is Lumen/L3 3356 but loss/latency doesn’t >>> appear to creep up until already within Arelion’s network. >>> >>> >>> >>> Imperva mentioned outage/degradation due to a national ISP issue too, so I >>> suspect it’s affecting more than just certain peerings. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> >>> >>> David >>>
