Wow... There is some serious learning about the internet to be done here! When Randy was deploying IPv6 across the IIJ backbone, I was running around in kindergarten. I didn't even know what the internet was back then.
Amazing what can happen in 26 years... Regards, Christopher Hawker On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 at 09:35, Abraham Y. Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Randy: > > 1) " ... dual-stack mess ... it was intended. it was the original > transition plan. ": > > Perhaps you are too young to realize that the original IPv6 plan was > not designed to be backward compatible to IPv4, and Dual-Stack was > developed (through some iterations) to bridge the transition between IPv4 > and IPv6? You may want to spend a few moments to read some history on this. > > > Regards, > > > Abe (2024-01-12 17:34) > > > > On 2024-01-12 00:11, Randy Bush wrote: > > We don't need to extend IPv4, we need to figure out why we are in this > dual-stack mess, which was never intended, and how to get out of it. > > it was intended. it was the original transition plan. like many things > about ipv6, it could have been a bit better thought out. > > randy > > > > > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> > Virus-free.www.avast.com > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> > <#m_-2764172948748324147_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> >
