No, I am not confusing those two. Actually, Im using 192.0.2.0 as well here, for server's internal SNAT.
Okey, I checked that registry and there is nothing I care about. It seems the choice to using 192.0.0.0/24 internally at desktop was smart enough ;) Thx for info. ---------- Original message ---------- From: John Kristoff <j...@dataplane.org> To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 07:29:54 -0500 On Tue, 14 May 2024 12:00:15 +0200 (CEST) b...@uu3.net wrote: > Was RFC5736 obsoleted? No. > Its a nice tiny subnet for special purposes. I personaly use it Are you confusing this with 192.0.2.0/24? 192.0.0.0/24 is occasionally updated with new assignments drawn from it. Just be aware you're potentially colliding with some other, new use in that range. John
