hi james > I recall there was a conversation either here on NANOG or maybe it was > at the IETF, within the last few years, about different NOSes that > were / were not correctly identifying route updates received with no > changes to the existing RIB entry, and [not] forwarding the update > onwards. I’m not sure what came of this.
RFC 9324 and https://archive.psg.com/220214.nanog-rov-no-rr.pdf randy
