In a message written on Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 09:19:50AM -0500, Jack Bates wrote: > Looking at just Oklahoma, I'm not sure AT&T could get even 200kb to > every household for $200b.
For an interesting set of cost comparisons....
In most locations every home has electrical service. What's the
cost per household?
Most houses have a statem maintained road in front of them, what
is the cost per household?
Many (although a lower number) of "city" water and sewer, what is
the cost per household?
For a number of reasons I would expect Broadband to be cheaper than any
of those, per household; but should definately not exceed any of them in
cost.
--
Leo Bicknell - [email protected] - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
pgpmvRvM024rg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
