Le jeudi 10 septembre 2009 à 11:20 -0600, Jason Iannone a écrit : > I would say confeds are more appropriate for larger ibgp networks. > You can have reflectors inside confederations. See the BGP chapter of > the JNCIP book.
I'd say, the choice is much dependent on the "political" topology within your AS. The more inter-regional routing policing you feel that you need, the more you'd be looking at a confed. architecture. mh > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Buraglio, Nicholas D > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Lots of things can be used to determine how you decide to set up your > > BGP peers. > > https://www.juniper.net/customers/csc/documentation/techdocs/downloads/pdf/350010.pdf > > has a decent amount of information on some of the differences that > > can help you decide how to set up your peerings. > > > > nb > > > > --- > > Nick Buraglio > > Network Engineer, CITES, University of Illinois > > GPG key 0x2E5B44F4 > > Phone: 217.244.6428 > > [email protected] > > > > On Sep 9, 2009, at 9:52 PM, devang patel wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> What are the advantages of BGP Confederation over Route Reflector? I > >> mean > >> when one should decide to deploy BGP Confederation over Route > >> Reflector > >> deployment? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Devang Patel > >> > > > > > > > -- michael hallgren, mh2198-ripe
