> So now Verizon is in open revolt against ARIN. They positively refuse > to carry /48's from legitimately multihomed users. Eff 'em. Perhaps > Verizon would sooner see IPv6 go down in flames than see their TCAMs > fill up again. Who knows their reasoning? > > Agree or disagree, it is indeed food for thought. One thing I can say > with confidence: as a community we truly haven't grasped the major > implications of an address space that isn't scarce coupled with a > routing table that is.
Thing is, I'm an end user site. I need more that a /48, but probably less than a /32. Seeing as how we have an AS and PI, PA isn't going to cut it. What am I supposed to do? ARIN suggested creative subnetting. We pushed back and got a /41. If IPv6 doesn't scratch an itch, why bother? There are plenty of high-profile end user sites in 2620::/23. Some government (CIA), some popular (Facebook.) I don't think Verizon's stand is going to last. Tim:>