I disagree. There was considerable concern with a misuse of a mechanism and its effect on various systems. That, from discussion on the IETF mailing list I was on when it was discussed there. There was no rough consensus that I could see.
On Dec 15, 2009, at 2:09 PM, Tony Finch wrote: > On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Florian Weimer wrote: >> * Eric J. Esslinger: >> >>> I found a reference to a null MX proposal, constructed so: >>> example.com IN MX 0 . >> >> I think this is quite controversal. > > My impression from discussions on various IETF lists is that most people > think it is a good idea, it is already reasonably widely implemented, but > no-one has the time and persistence to push a spec through to publication. > > Tony. > -- > f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ > GERMAN BIGHT HUMBER: SOUTHWEST 5 TO 7. MODERATE OR ROUGH. SQUALLY SHOWERS. > MODERATE OR GOOD.