Wouldn't that be kind of pointless? ARIN policies are proposed by the
public, not ARIN staff or board members.
https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html
Policy proposals may be submitted by anyone in the global Internet
community except for members of the ARIN Board of Trustees or the ARIN
staff.
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009, O'Reirdan, Michael wrote:
JD
Great point, I am more than happy to have a couple of people from ARIN or
RIPE as guests at the next MAAWG in SFO or the subsequent one in Barcelona.
Mike
On 12/23/09 1:18 PM, "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-li...@cybernothing.org> wrote:
On Dec 22, 2009, at 11:58 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Paul Ferguson <fergdawgs...@gmail.com>
wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Folks should not be so obtuse about these activities. It's almost
blatantly
in-your-face, so to speak. These guys have no fear of retribution.
no real arguement, but... 'please provide some set of workable solutions'
The ARIN meetings (at least) are open, please come and help guide
policies. I'm sure RIPE also wouldn't mind a discussion, if there
could be some positive policy outcome.
Rather than expecting anti-spam researchers to lobby at ARIN & RIPE meetings,
perhaps ARIN & RIPE representatives could visit anti-spam meetings such as
MAAWG to ask how they can help?
I'd be happy to make some introductions.
--
J.D. Falk <jdf...@returnpath.net>
Return Path Inc
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis | I route
Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are
Atlantic Net |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
