In message <[email protected]>, Jorge Amodio writes: > Good point, tomorrow/today we'll start seeing what gets broken and > hopefully why. > > Regards. > Jorge
I don't expect to see much until the last root server (J) switches over. DNS implemententations are remarkably robust at routing around percieved "damage". Week of 2010-05-03: J starts to serve DURZ Mark > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Danny McPherson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Figured I'd drop a note here reminding folks of the > > signed root zone publication timeline, which calls for > > L root to begin serving a 'DURZ' the "week of 1/25/2010" > > -- which is now - depending on what timezone you're in: > > > > <http://www.root-dnssec.org/2010/01/14/status-update-january-2010/> > > > > If you've not evaluated the *systemic effects* of a signed > > root zone in your operating environment (prepped operations > > and helpdesk staff, your own resolvers, etc..) I'd strongly > > suggest you do so ASAP. > > > > If you're not concerned because you're not signing anything - > > do note that 'systemic' is the operative word above, as this > > will impact you, whether you make any explicit changes in > > your environment or not. > > > > G'luck, > > > > -danny > > > > -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected]
