On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Jeffrey Lyon <[email protected]> wrote: > IntruGuard is highly customizable both from the GUI and CLI with the > engineer's assistance. Its the highest performance, reasonably priced box > that we've tried so far.
'highest performance' == 100mbps on a 1gbps copper interface? or sessions setup/second? or remote-addresses tracked? or ? -chris > > Jeff > > On Jan 28, 2010 7:02 AM, "Tom Sands" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: David Freedman [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tues... > We've already done an initial trial with the Arbor device, and it does work > well. Our biggest sticking point with it is that it lacks the granular > level of visibility and control that we've been used to and often needed to > tweak profiles. Basically, it does what it's supposed to well, but you > really can't tell what that is, and if it's not catching all of a DDoS you > have little insight as to what's being missed or control to correct it. > > > > Thank you, > > Tom Sands > Chief Network Engineer > Rackspace > > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message (including any attached or > embedded documents) is intend... >
