On Feb 4, 2010, at 3:14 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > I know someone who'd happily sink both the /24's in question.. if apnic's > interested.
Given that it is not in the table today, just announcing it would yield both interesting traffic, and interesting data on who is filtering it. -- TTFN, patrick > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Jared Mauch <ja...@puck.nether.net> wrote: > >> >> On Feb 4, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Kevin Loch wrote: >> >>> Mirjam Kuehne wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> After 1/8 was allocated to APNIC last week, the RIPE NCC did some >> measurements to find out how "polluted" this block really is. >>>> See some surprising results on RIPE Labs: >> http://labs.ripe.net/content/pollution-18 >>>> Please also note the call for feedback at the bottom of the article. >>> >>> The most surprising thing in that report was that someone has an AMS-IX >>> port at just 10 megs. It would be nice to see an actual measurement of >>> the traffic and daily/weekly changes. A breakdown of the flow data by >>> source ASN and source prefix (for the top 50-100 sources) would also be >>> interesting. >> >> There was a call on the apnic list for someone to sink some of the traffic. >> >> I'd like to see someone capture the data and post pcaps/netflow analysis, >> and possibly just run a http server on that /24 so people can test if their >> network is broken. >> >> I've taken a peek at the traffic, and I don't think it's 100's of megs, but >> without a global view who knows. >> >> - Jared >> >