On 04/03/2010 19:30, William Herrin wrote: > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Joel Jaeggli <joe...@bogus.com> wrote: >> handling the v6 table is not currently hard (~2600 prefixes) while long >> term the temptation to do TE is roughly that same in v6 as in v4, the >> prospect of having a bunch of non-aggregatable direct assignments should >> be much lower... > Because we expect far fewer end users to multihome tomorrow than do today?
The opposite, but a clean slate means multihomed networks with many v4 prefixes may be able to be a multihomed network with just one v6 prefix. Andy
