On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Chris Adams <[email protected]> wrote: > Once upon a time, Michael Thomas <[email protected]> said: >> All true, but I'd still say there's a special rung in hell for bad perl. > > Ehh, bad perl is still more readable than good APL. At least I can > reformat the perl! :-)
In my experience bad perl usually consists of using system() a lot to run shell commands and read the input. Creative well-written perl, now there's something unreadable and unmaintainable! :-) -B
