This is an example of the law that the number of replys is directly propotional to the cluelessness of the post?
Bruce On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Jaap Akkerhuis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It was, for at least some versions (V2 and later?), if the > intermediate site(s) allowed execution of the uucp command. 25 > years on the brain is fuzzy on the details ... > > You could certainly add uux and uux to the list of legal remote > commands, but I confess that my memory is also dim about whether > > uucp file a!b!c > > would be translated automatically. It has indeed been a while... > > Yup. The real work was done by uucico (using an x.21 type protocol > implemented by Greg Chesson of EGREG fame if I remember correctly). > UUCP and friends where front-ends for it and has been reimplemnted > as the honeydanber version. Then there were the AT&T Basic Network > Utilities version, Taylor uucp, the EUUG version etc. of these. > > jaap > > -- - Bruce Williams
