On 04/07/2010 11:26 AM, Antonio Querubin wrote: > On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, John Palmer \(NANOG Acct\) wrote: >> Isn't this a disincentive for us to move up to IP6? > > Yep. Just went through this with one organization which I hadn't > realized at the time was a legacy IPv4 holder. The fees were a surprise > (I thought they'd already been paying those fees). Needless to say, > their IPv6 plans are on hold indefinitely.
How much IPv6 address space were they expecting? I have trouble envisioning any operation that could require more than a /32 immediately that can't afford to pay $4500 per YEAR. -- Kevin Stange Chief Technology Officer Steadfast Networks http://steadfast.net Phone: 312-602-2689 ext. 203 | Fax: 312-602-2688 | Cell: 312-320-5867
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
