Yah, thats what we are thinking here. We'll probably stick with IP4 only.
Sounds like ARIN has set a trap, so that virtually any contact with them
will result in the ceding of legacy rights.
We'll be sure to avoid any such contact.
Thanks everyone for the info.
John
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Greco" <jgr...@ns.sol.net>
To: "Owen DeLong" <o...@delong.com>
Cc: "NANOG list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: ARIN IP6 policy for those with legacy IP4 Space
It's not the initial assignment fee that's really an impediment, it's
moving from a model where the address space is free (or nearly so) to
a model where you're paying a significant annual fee for the space.
We'd be doing IPv6 here if not for the annual fee. As it stands, there
isn't that much reason to do IPv6, and a significant disincentive in the
form of the fees.
... JG
--
