Just wondering if this was a "Fat fingered" mistake or intentional...
-J > -----Original Message----- > From: Frank Pater [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 1:20 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: China prefix hijack > > > Hi, > > We received BGPmon notifications for all of our prefixes as > well. Not sure if it's relevant, but this is also announced > upstream from us by 3491. Example: > > ==================================================================== > Possible Prefix Hijack (Code: 10) > ==================================================================== > Your prefix: 216.158.0.0/18: > Update time: 2010-04-08 15:58 (UTC) > Detected by #peers: 1 > Detected prefix: 216.158.0.0/18 > Announced by: AS23724 (CHINANET-IDC-BJ-AP IDC, China > Telecommunications Corporation) > Upstream AS: AS4134 (CHINANET-BACKBONE No.31,Jin-rong Street) > ASpath: 39792 4134 23724 23724 > > > -- > Frank Pater > DCANet > http://www.dca.net > voice: 888-4-DCANET (888-432-2638) > fax: 302-426-6386 > > > On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 12:39:57PM -0400, Chris McDonald wrote: > > i think so yeah > > > > AS 23724 is now announcing 63.218.188.0/22 which is historically > > announced by ASes: 3491. > > Time: Thu Apr 8 16:55:02 2010 GMT > > Observed path: 812 174 4134 23724 23724 > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Grzegorz Janoszka > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > Just half an hour ago China Telecom hijacked one of our prefixes: > > > > > > Your prefix: X.Y.Z.0/19: > > > Prefix Description: NETNAME > > > Update time: 2010-04-08 15:58 (UTC) > > > Detected by #peers: 1 > > > Detected prefix: X.Y.Z.0/19 > > > Announced by: AS23724 (CHINANET-IDC-BJ-AP IDC, China > > > Telecommunications Corporation) > > > Upstream AS: AS4134 (CHINANET-BACKBONE > No.31,Jin-rong Street) > > > ASpath: 39792 4134 23724 23724 > > > > > > Luckily it had to be limited as only one BGPmon peer saw > it. Anyone > > > else noticed it? > > > > > > -- > > > Grzegorz Janoszka > > > > > > > >
