> -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Dillon [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 3:40 PM > To: NANOG list > Subject: Re: Cheers to the Communication Committee [was: Likely /8 > Scenario - Carriers will TAKE what they want ?] > > > I guarantee you the Communications Committee is on the job. What's > more, they are doing a GREAT job - for no money and apparently no > gratitude. It is worse than thankless, no matter what they do they > will be derided. Filter someone and they get flamed. Leave someone > allowed to post and they get reamed. I'm shocked anyone would actually > want the job. > > So why can't the Communications Committee do a little communicating. > Sure it's thankless work if you do it in secret and in silence. But > the occasional message to the list wouldn't hurt. People WOULD feel > thankful if they see that the CC is making an attempt. > > > So, I propose a new rule: To flame the CC, you MUST have volunteered > to be on the CC. > > Right, so you are an unvolunteer on the CC. Why do we only hear from > unvolunteers? > Hello:
The Communications Committee follows a published procedure for handling violations of the AUP, found at http://www.nanog.org/governance/communications/warningpolicy.php. The process is not instantaneous, but is designed to insure we are not acting with undue haste when taking action against a particular list participant. We are always open to suggestions and comments regarding the process and the best forum for that is nanog-futures. This is also an appropriate venue for discussing the idea of more formal and/or frequent notifications from the Communications Committee regarding actions we have taken. Kind Regards, Michael Smith On behalf of the Communications Committee
