On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:25:46 -0400 Christopher Morrow <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Owen DeLong <[email protected]> wrote: > > While I think this is an improvement, unless the distribution of ULA-C is > > no cheaper > > and no easier to get than GUA, I still think there is reason to believe > > that it is likely > > ULA-C will become de facto GUA over the long term. > > > > As such, I still think the current draft is a bad idea absent appropriate > > protections in > > RIR policy. > > I agree with owen, mostly... except I think we should just push RIR's > to make GUA accessible to folks that need ipv6 adress space, > regardless of connectiivty to thegreater 'internet' (for some > definition of that thing). > > ULA of all types causes headaches on hosts, routers, etc. There is no > reason to go down that road, just use GUA (Globally Unique Addresses). > So what happens when you change providers? How are you going to keep using globals that now aren't yours? I'm also curious about these headaches. What are they? > -Chris >
