Hello, Just wanted to say thanks to everybody who replied and/or offered help. I've got a few private peering offers, so I guess I'm ok now. Thanks a lot,
Michael On Friday 14 May 2010 11:25:10 pm Michael Ulitskiy wrote: > Guys, > > I've started this thread looking for advice on available options. > There's no doubt in my mind that native connectivity is better than tunnels, > but unfortunately tunnel is the only way to get me started, 'cause my > upstream > does not support ipv6 (hopefully just yet) and I have no budget for > additional > circuits to ipv6-enabled carrier. > So my question still stands: is anyone aware of a reasonable tunneled ipv6 > transit service (I mean aside from HE tunnel broker)? The load will be really > light. I don't expect we'll break a few Mbit/s in the nearest future and when > we do then I guess it'll be the time to look for the native transit. > Thanks, > > Michael > > On Thursday 13 May 2010 18:18:12 Michael Ulitskiy wrote: > > Hello, > > > > We're in the early stage of planning ipv6 deployment - > > learning/labbing/experimenting/etc. We've got to the point when we're also > > planning to request initial ipv6 allocation from ARIN. So I wonder what > > ipv6 transit options I have if my upstreams do not support native ipv6 > > connectivity? I see Hurricane Electric tunnel broker BGP tunnel. Is there > > anything else? Either free or commercial? Thanks, > > > > Michael > > > >
