On 6/13/2010 18:09, Brett Frankenberger wrote: > On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 03:23:06PM -0500, Larry Sheldon wrote: >> On 6/13/2010 14:59, Joe Greco wrote: >> >>>>>> How about the case where the master zone file has be amputated and the >>>>>> secondaries can no longer get updates? >> >> Mea culpa. >> >> That was suppose to say "How about the case where the master zone file >> has beEN amputated and the secondaries can no longer get updates? > > I'm really not sure what you're asking, and I don't know what "master > zone file has been amputated" means, but if the master server goes > unreachable, then, for each secondary, either: > (a) it's not reachable from anywhere, in which case it doesn't really > matter what information it has because nothing will be querying it, or > (b) it is reachable from somewhere, in which case you log in to it > from that somewhere, edit the configuration file, change "slave" to > "master", and restart BIND. (Adjust as needed for whatever DNS server > is in use, if it's not BIND.)
I have been faulted for injecting "politics" into the discussion of BGP configurations for people that ought not...... There I go again. Have you actually read the article I posted at the top of this thread? -- Somebody should have said: A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner. Freedom under a constitutional republic is a well armed lamb contesting the vote. Requiescas in pace o email Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Eppure si rinfresca ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
