On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:18:39 +0100 Nick Hilliard <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 23/07/2010 01:17, Mark Smith wrote: > > Does this qualify? What the customer sees is delivered over IPv6, > > unlike the CPE management problem, where the ISP is the "IPv6 customer". > > > > "IPv6: The Future of IPTV? In Japan it isn't the future, it's now." > > http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3795086/IPv6-The-Future-of-IPTV.htm > > I understand that there are several networks doing this; the STB - like the > CPE modem - is managed by the service provider and the customer has no > management / control access over it. The customer stays on ipv4 for their > regular access product. > > Someone offline pointed me at the Google IPv6 Implementors 2010 conference, > at which: > > > https://sites.google.com/site/ipv6implementors/2010/agenda/13_Byrne_T-Mobile_IPv6GoogleMeeting.pdf?attredirects=0&d=1 > > This is genuinely interesting. > Certainly is. I've generally classified mobile operators as people who are heavily on the side of walled gardens. It's refreshing to see one advocating e2e and global reachability. > Nick
