On Aug 16, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Owen DeLong wrote: > > John/Steve, Just me (we don't pay Steve to read Nanog, although I do forward him legalistic emails depending on content :-)
> Bill makes a reasonable point here. Is there a way to, in the next round of > LRSA mods, include something to the effect of: > > Under the ARIN Policy Development Process, the board will not ratify any > policy which exclusively affects LRSA signatories in a manner inconsistent > with its effect on other resource holders. > > === > > That's probably not ideal wording, but, I hope it conveys the general idea > and I hope smarter people can find better language. It does seem to me > to be a reasonable request and consistent with the intent of the LRSA. > > If you prefer that I submit this via ACSP I will do so. However, it seems to > me it could fall within the same scope as the other clarification John offered > earlier. I'll run with it, but would ask you send in to the suggestion process so that it doesn't get lost given our level of activity nowadays. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN