On 18 aug 2010, at 09:35, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Marco Hogewoning <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 18 aug 2010, at 01:12, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: >> >>> prefer static addressing. But in the world of facebook and co. I >>> wonder if it would be a better to let the user have the choice. A >> >> What does facebook have to do with it ? Ever heard of cookies ? > > Facebook as an example of a company whose founder stated that privacy > is old-fashioned. Cookies sit on another network-layer I am currently > not talking about. They can be removed more easily, most simply by > reinstalling your computer. The user *can* do something about cookies.
Yeah but given the amount of NAT and dynamic addresses around in v4 land. I think it's highly unlikely you are better of tracking v4 addresses instead of pushing cookies, especially as most 2.0 sites require a login anyway. Groet, MarcoH
