On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 04:41:56PM -0500, Jack Bates wrote: > prefixes to the unnumbered interface. If you use dslam level controls, > you'll most likely being using DHCPv6 TA addressing with PD on top of it, > which works well. Most of which can support quick static/dynamic > capabilities as it does with v4.
This is surprising to me, can you comment on why DHCPv6 TA is being used in this scenario? -- David W. Hankins BIND 10 needs more DHCP voices. Software Engineer There just aren't enough in our heads. Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. http://bind10.isc.org/
pgpTGtJ5BUH5I.pgp
Description: PGP signature
