-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Clay Fiske <c...@bloomcounty.org> wrote:
> > On Aug 27, 2010, at 1:57 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > >> >> That works fine for malformed attributes. It blows chunks for legally >> formed but unknown attributes - how would you ever deploy a new >> attribute? > > By making it optional. Seems to me that's pretty well covered by the Path > Attributes section of the RFC. > > A bad attribute isn't simply unknown, it's malformed. My apologies for > not wording that more precisely. > > I do see the wisdom of fine-grained control of this behavior. I'm just > saying, it'd be nice if we could have correct behavior on the basics in > the first place. :) > As an aside, I see that Cisco has released a late Friday afternoon security advisory on this issue: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20100827-bgp.shtml FYI, - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003) wj8DBQFMeFNZq1pz9mNUZTMRAkR9AJ9cTz71N5/RMaQFD6LsumKLhpfASACdHrBR 4uQ0+oes21gvTS5IVJZXMds= =5wqD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawgster(at)gmail.com ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/