Even Micr0$0ft refers to Teredo as "The absolute last resort for IPv6 connectivity".
Owen On Sep 11, 2010, at 9:28 AM, Jared Mauch wrote: > I would be careful actually using teredo, as some of them (eg: Microsoft) > have swaths of native IPv6 networks that are unreachable. > > I'm hoping they will correct some of the problems with it, but it makes IPv6 > harder to use for some people as the Microsoft one does not appear to be well > supported/connected. I'm not sure if there is an effort under way on > Microsofts behalf to correct this, but I hope so. > > - Jared > > On Sep 10, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Antonio Querubin wrote: > >> On Fri, 10 Sep 2010, Fernando Gont wrote: >> >>> Does any body maintain a list of Teredo servers and Teredo relays? >> >> A list of public Teredo servers might be useful. But a list of public >> relays - not so much. >> >> If you google around you'll eventually stumble across the following public >> servers: >> >> teredo.ipv6.microsoft.com >> teredo.remlab.net >> teredo2.remlab.net >> debian-miredo.progsoc.org >> teredo.ginzado.ne.jp >> teredo.iks-jena.de >> >> The first is the default for Windows. The second is the initial default for >> most Miredo installs. The fourth is supposedly the default for the Debian >> Miredo package. >> >> You can get an idea of where some public relays might be at: >> >> http://www.bgpmon.net/teredo.php >> >> But there may be a bunch of others not listed. The relay used varies on a >> per-connection basis. It'll generally be the closest relay to the >> non-teredo host. >> >> Antonio Querubin >> 808-545-5282 x3003 >> e-mail/xmpp: [email protected] >
