On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 12:47:52PM -0400, Greg Whynott wrote:
>
> A partner had a security audit done on their site. The report said they were
> at risk of a DoS due to the fact they didn't have a SPF record.
that does not follow at all.
>
> I commented to his team that the SPF idea has yet to see anything near mass
> deployment and of the millions of emails leaving our environment yearly, I
> doubt any of them have ever been dropped due to us not having an SPF record
> in our DNS. When a client's email doesn't arrive somewhere, we will hear
> about it quickly, and its investigated/reported upon. I'm not opposed
> to putting one in our DNS, and probably will now - for completeness/best
> practice sake..
>
>
> how many of you are using SPF records? Do you have an opinion on their
> use/non use of?
I don't use them.
--bill
>
> take care,
> greg
>
>
>
>
>
>
