On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 09:03 -0700, Owen DeLong wrote: > > About the only hack I can see that *might* make sense would be that home > > CPE does NOT honour the upstream lifetimes if upstream connectivity is > > lost, but instead keeps the prefix alive on very short lifetimes until > > upstream connectivity returns. > > > Which is exactly what was being proposed when Tim responded that it > would break the IPv6 spec.
Yes it does. But as long as there is no upstream connectivity, it doesn't matter. Personally I don't think it makes a *lot* of sense, but it does make some. Regards, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer ([email protected]) +61-2-64957160 (h) http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer/ +61-428-957160 (mob) GPG fingerprint: B386 7819 B227 2961 8301 C5A9 2EBC 754B CD97 0156 Old fingerprint: 07F3 1DF9 9D45 8BCD 7DD5 00CE 4A44 6A03 F43A 7DEF
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
