I am just curios what kind of application/network requires this aggressive monitoring.
Is it possible to share this information ? Cheers On 11/26/10, Ivan Brunello <[email protected]> wrote: > Sure it upsets. > We have a bunch of average-populated 6500s, > using the default max age (which was, as far as I remember, 5) made > the switches very slow in responding to SNMP queries. > set them to 10, and, Gotcha! everything works very well. > > ivan > >> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:25:25 +0200 >> From: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: Network management software with high detailed traffic >> report >> To: [email protected] >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed >> >> There is also CSCsg23226 which might be related. >> >> -- >> Tassos >> >> >> Nick Hilliard wrote on 23/11/2010 01:35: >>> On 22/11/2010 22:56, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote: >>>> Does "service counters max age" help in any way?* >>>> *According to Cisco, setting it too low might upset the snmp counters.* >>> >>>> https://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/fundamentals/command/reference/cf_r1.html#wp1067159 >>>> >>> >>> The "Usage Guidelines" are instructive. :-) >>> >>> Although the update interval defaults to 5 seconds, it still appears >>> to update every 9 seconds on my boxes. >>> >>> Nick >>> >>> > > -- Sent from my mobile device ./diogo -montagner
