On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Leo Bicknell <bickn...@ufp.org> wrote:
> No one will ever be in ratio compliance with an eyeball dominant > network. Ever. Period. It's not possible via technology and > TOS. Enforcing it as an eyeball network just forces content providers > to aquire eyeballs, e.g. compete with you. That's bad business. see craig's report from nanog47: <http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog47/presentations/Monday/Labovitz_ObserveReport_N47_Mon.pdf> not for a time has Comcast been solely an 'eye-ball' network... or so they think. -chris (I don't disagree with leo's stance, though I'm not a peering person so I really try never to know how all of that magic works)