> Well -- spammers are following the NANOG list in real-time, it seems. A = > few hours after my post this afternoon, I received some spam with a = > correct Subject: line for that post. I'll be happy to forward the email = > to anyone who wants to analyze it or find the offender and permanently = > blacklist "her" from NANOG...
Funny you should mention that. About two seconds before your message, I got such a bit of spam. > From [email protected] Tue Dec 7 17:43:02 2010 > Return-Path: <[email protected]> > Received: from nm15.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm15.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com > [98.138.90.78]) > by mx1.sol.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/SNNS-1.04) with SMTP id oB7Ngtf7002716 > for <[email protected]>; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 17:43:00 -0600 (CST) > Received: from [98.138.90.51] by nm15.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; > 07 Dec 2010 23:42:50 -0000 > Received: from [98.138.87.1] by tm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 > Dec 2010 23:42:50 -0000 > Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1001.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Dec > 2010 23:42:50 -0000 > X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 > X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: [email protected] > Received: (qmail 17052 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Dec 2010 23:42:49 -0000 > DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; > t=1291765369; bh=Nwik8gyzMPW2hSR2Fc+0a6ZUu1s5oHBhOjv0Shs9wCE=; > h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; > > b=4Yw5bYZ0DJq7pbortuz7YK0J5opr+dQ0vk3FJ3V5uTF/jVuFRcu9hJxBZ/8u4xakvycmSMYOFDMR3oFL6t2JmSt3x4JZmCnDjlS79cL3arFsW/a0aBm9pubfPCYqijis3iCY6uNhji6JxYe0OWsMlHU3qTNohvs+dwMUl/gQ8R0= > DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; > s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; > > h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; > > b=a+L6kibArtNLl3qtSuIHEDxKt2dZfrXLRiUE91IWnNsW6NZ11W6RG51LRXFK288erRYh7k9t2evvpBxbkAH7XKQ/B/+lIBaZqgZ5ON3MC3ziMmhrjn3UIX1o1obMDz0vO7R94K4iapDIpVlD9xXPOSgc1ENMoW8GA6eoKKRDUbs=; > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > X-YMail-OSG: tTFoZPoVM1lORXP10bFDAvyxx.jFIQDoUGJ6hUxCf6q8Tbk > 8RkTR2Q6BakFB1l6t1W5BdZ4fPFVQEWRX_TSB16hGCUxPmFhrTru8ItaSrSg > oF9x5JBC6GwAHAwzXaeCohqEqZsyOLa9vBCXu_kKyxJv_zCea2QtIZ_PFH23 > rGr_j.u85nfOQA_6VJ3uLvtpJ75N0.ufEudhqcR6ZhL4bPb8LTxKYxAtZQ2N > _j50f7Uf_DOQ- > Received: from [173.208.43.151] by web120306.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; > Tue, 07 Dec 2010 15:42:49 PST > X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 > Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 15:42:49 -0800 (PST) > From: Carla Fletcher <[email protected]> > Reply-To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Re: Abuse@ contacts > To: [email protected] I didn't know that anybody was still keying on subject lines; our spam filter tossed it anyways. ... JG -- Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net "We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN) With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.
