Here's what I see: Level 3: 2949 HE: 3775 NTT: 3867 Init7: 3665
Mike -- Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksm...@adhost.com w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050 PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D) > -----Original Message----- > From: Frank Bulk [mailto:frnk...@iname.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 3:08 PM > To: 'Jared Mauch' > Cc: NANOG list > Subject: RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons > > The provider who gave me the information didn't tell me what public route > server they used. They didn't analyze all ASNs, just the handful I listed. > > It would be interesting if someone set up a daily report that documented all > the IPv6 routes an ASN carried, and then tracked both the absolute numbers > and percentages over time. > > Frank > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net] > Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 4:51 PM > To: frnk...@iname.com > Cc: NANOG list > Subject: Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons > > Not sure what route-server you are speaking of, but a quick peek at what we > send on a customer session I see: > > NTT (2914) sends 3868 prefixes. > > If the route server contacts me in private, we can likely set up a view from > 2914 or 2914-customer perspective. > > - Jared > > On Dec 21, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Frank Bulk wrote: > > > There are 4,035 routes in the global IPv6 routing table. This is what one > > provider passed on to me for routes (/48 or larger prefixes), extracted > from > > public route-view servers. > > AT&T AS7018: 2,851 (70.7%) > > Cogent AS174: 2,864 (71.0%) > > GLBX AS3549: 3,706 (91.8%) > > Hurricane Electric AS6939: 3,790 (93.9%) > > Qwest AS209: 3,918 (97.1%) > > TINET (formerly Tiscali) AS3257: 3,825 (94.8%) > > Verizon AS701: 3,938 (97.6%) > > > > Frank > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bryan Fields [mailto:br...@bryanfields.net] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 12:56 PM > > To: NANOG list > > Subject: Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons > > > > On 12/21/2010 11:32, Frank Bulk wrote: > >> A week or more ago someone posted in NANOG or elsewhere a site that > had > > made > >> a comparison of the IPv6 BGP table sizes of different operators (i.e. HE, > >> Cogent, Sprint, etc), making the point that a full view might take > > multiple > >> feeds. I think that website also had text files with the comparisons. > > > > Whip yours out and lets have an on list comparison of table sizes > > > > :-D > > -- > > Bryan Fields > > > > 727-409-1194 - Voice > > 727-214-2508 - Fax > > http://bryanfields.net > > > > > > > >