Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links

[Randy Bush]

>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-prefixlen-p2p/ 
> All of the (mostly religious) arguments about /64 versus any
> smaller subnets aside, I'm curious about why one would choose
> /126 over /127 for P-to-P links?

see above

randy