On Feb 1, 2011, at 9:39 AM, Jack Bates wrote: > On 2/1/2011 11:29 AM, Owen DeLong wrote: >> >> I prefer persistent GUA over ULA for that. >> > > I do too, though for simple zeroconf devices, I'd prefer ULA over link local. > Given that it's not an either or situation, I fully support ULA existing. > > > Jack
Given the vast probability for abuse of ULA becoming de facto GUA later, I don't support ULA existing as the benefits are vastly overwhelmed by the potential for abouse.
