On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 16:42:14 -0500, Nathan Eisenberg
<nat...@atlasnetworks.us> wrote:
What do you mean, lit up? You mean they're not in the routing tables
that you get from your carriers? I'd argue that's no indication of
whether they're in use or not.
That's pretty much the definition of "in use". If they don't appear in
the global routing table, then they aren't being used. I cannot send
traffic to them; they cannot send traffic to me.
In my recent probe of route servers, I found 22 legacy /8's that were
partly or completely unused. I'm a little surprised ARIN/ICANN thinks
it's a waste of time to even try to reclaim them.
--Ricky
- Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... William Herrin
- Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... George Herbert
- Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... William Herrin
- IPv6 mistakes, was: Re: Looking for an I... Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re: Looking ... Nathan Eisenberg
- Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re: Loo... Joel Jaeggli
- Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re: Loo... Ricky Beam
- Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re:... Jason Fesler
- Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re:... Mark Andrews
- Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re:... Matthew Moyle-Croft
- Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re:... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re:... Owen DeLong
- Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re:... Ricky Beam
- Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re:... David Conrad
- Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re:... Henk Uijterwaal
- Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re:... Cutler James R
- Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re:... Joel Jaeggli