In message <4d55abce.7030...@brightok.net>, Jack Bates writes: > On 2/11/2011 3:31 PM, George Bonser wrote: > > "IPv6 is foundational to the next-generation Internet, enabling a > > range of new services and improved user experiences." > > > > Apparently they see IPv6 as some "next-generation Internet" thing. > > It isn't. > > Reread what they wrote. IPv6 is "foundational" to the next-generation > Internet. If it's not, then IETF should have added 96 bits and left the > rest of it alone. > > I can't blame Cisco for making sure how they implement the linksys is > appropriate for the long term. It's important that they get certain > things right, as future improvements of the Internet DO depend on IPv6 > being functional.
They have had a #@!@ decade to add IPv6 support. They shouldn't need anymore time. Part of the reason we are in this mess is their delay in delivering products. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org