Hi, On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:44:56 -0800 Leo Bicknell <[email protected]> wrote:
> In a message written on Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 04:36:28PM -0500, > Christopher Morrow wrote: > > leaking the IX prefix to customers, to me, seems like a recipe for > > much wider/unintended leakage :( > > Oh, it is. I remember when MAE-EAST was injected by at least 50 > people into the DFZ because back then people weren't careful enough > to just send such things to customers. > > AMS-IX (and others) have the better solution. They have AS1200, > announce the exchange LAN from AS1200 (195.69.144.0/22). They will > peer with you if you are at the exchange, see > http://www.ams-ix.net/as1200-peering/. I believe, but can't find > a reference really quick that they get transit for it from a couple > of providers so those that don't peer still have the route. We advertise 195.69.144.0/22 with no-export. Kind regards, Martin
