Hi Randy, I don't advocate for 6to4. I'm for dual-stack, even with IPv4 private addresses and NAT, which is what we have today.
However, we like it or not 6to4 is there in many platforms, and the best we can do is to deploy 6to4 relays in both sides, ISPs and content providers. That will minimise the problem. I think some other folks in the list already said it many times. I think is much much much better having 6to4 and relays than nothing. Same observations for Teredo. Regards, Jordi -----Mensaje original----- De: Randy Bush <[email protected]> Responder a: <[email protected]> Fecha: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 18:19:27 +0900 Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <[email protected]> CC: <[email protected]> Asunto: Re: Real World NAT64 deployments >> 6to4 is an automatic transition mechanism > ^ non- > >which allows an end site to have horrible v6 pseudo-connectivity over a >provider who has not deployed ipv6 > >randy ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.consulintel.es The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
