On 6 Apr 2011, at 23:17, Daniel Roesen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 08:05:59PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote: >> Some older equipment will unequally prefer certain links over others, >> depending on the number of members in the LAG. I.e. a 2-member LAG might >> load balance equally under ideal conditions, but a 3-member LAG might >> naturally load balance 2:2:1. > > Even newer gear does that. TurboIron 24X for example.
I believe this has been fixed on s/w version 4.2.00 on the turboiron, and that it can now support arbitrary numbers of lag members. Haven't tested it though... Nick
