Sent from my iPad
On Apr 9, 2011, at 4:31 AM, Job Snijders <j...@instituut.net> wrote: > Dear All, > > On 8 Apr 2011, at 19:34, Lori Jakab wrote: > >> On 04/08/2011 06:39 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: > >>> LISP can also be a good option. Comes with slightly more overhead in terms >>> of >>> encapsulation/etc. than the GRE tunnels I use and has limited (if any) >>> functionality >>> for IPv4 (which GRE supports nicely). >> >> Maybe you meant ILNP here? AFAIK, IPv4 and IPv6 are equal citizens for LISP. > > Comparing GRE with LISP is like comparing /etc/hosts with the global DNS > system. ;-) > > I don't understand the comments about LISP and IPv4. IPv4 works just > excellent with LISP. I have a IPv4 block at home which I multi-home over my > IPv6-only DSL and IPv4-only FTTH line. > > LISP is pretty address family agnostic: IPv4 over IPv4, IPv4 over IPv6, IPv6 > over IPv4, IPv6 over IPv6, all work without problems. > > Kind regards, > > Job Doing IPv4 LISP on any kind of scale requires significant additional prefixes which at this time doesn't seem so practical to me. Owen
