On Tue, 17 May 2011 20:22:23 PDT, Joel Jaeggli said: > On May 17, 2011, at 7:51 PM, Scott Weeks wrote: > > Only if you design your network that way. EUI-64 isn't required. > don't much matter, if you move around you're going get them a lot.
Of course, if you're moving around and getting EUI-64 addresses via SLAAC, you can almost certainly use RFC4941 privacy addresses (instead of/in addition to) your MAC-address based address. Unless you end up behind a fascist firewall that actually checks that the EUI-64 half of the SLAAC address actually matches your MAC address - but we all know that firewalls are weak at IPv6 support, so probably nobody's actually doing that checking. :)
pgpTvb98PTcxj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
